Case Summary
Mr. M is a skilled migration applicant working in Tasmania. In September 2024, his application for the Tasmania 190 state nomination was refused. The reason for the refusal was that his salary payments were inconsistent, and he did not provide sufficient supporting documents, making it difficult for the state officer to verify the authenticity of his employment relationship.
After taking over the case, we analyzed Mr. M’s situation and organized all documents related to his employment from the time he started working until the submission of his application. Through meticulous review of each document, we identified several issues, including unstable working hours and some wages being paid in cash. Additionally, the previous agent failed to consider the unique aspects of his case and merely submitted standard documents without establishing sufficient connections and correlations between them. These issues made his employment relationship appear questionable, which ultimately led to the refusal.
Mr. M’s situation was extremely urgent as his occupation could only receive an invitation through the 190 state nomination. After taking on the case, we conducted a comprehensive discussion with Mr. M, verifying his salary details one by one and quickly formulated an application strategy. To clearly demonstrate Mr. M’s actual work situation to the Tasmanian government, we helped him identify the inconsistencies in his employment documents and assisted him in preparing crucial explanations and supplementary evidence. Additionally, we communicated directly with his employer and, with their cooperation, obtained supporting documents from the company level. Through this multi-pronged approach, we thoroughly proved his genuine work relationship and explained the reasons for the inconsistencies.
We presented a logically clear and well-supported appeal to the state government, demonstrating that Mr. M’s employment relationship was legitimate and met the state nomination requirements.
On the 20th day after the refusal, and just two weeks after we took on the case, we submitted the appeal materials. Only three working days later, without any further requests for documents, the Tasmanian state government granted him the 190 state nomination invitation.
This case highlights the importance of ensuring document consistency in state nomination applications. Even when faced with complex backgrounds and seemingly unfavorable conditions, a well-supported application with professional guidance can still reverse the situation and achieve migration goals.
Approval Letter
