Relationship Ended Due to Violence
Check Your Visa Options
Tell us about your situation and speak with a HECT visa expert.
- ✓Family violence provisions explained
- ✓Evidence requirements reviewed
- ✓Subclass 820/801 application support
Free initial assessment call. Confidential.
Takes about 60 seconds
If your relationship has ended and your partner visa application is still on foot, you may have heard about the partner visa family violence provisions. These rules exist so that a person who has experienced family violence is not forced to choose between staying in an unsafe relationship and keeping their pathway to permanent residence in Australia. They are also one of the most technically demanding parts of the partner visa system, and a genuine claim can still fail if the evidence does not meet the exact form the regulations require.
A recent Administrative Review Tribunal decision, 2214513 (Migration) [2026] ARTA 1834, is a useful illustration. The applicant’s relationship had ended and the sponsor had withdrawn sponsorship, so the applicant relied on the family violence provisions. The Tribunal ultimately set aside the refusal of the Subclass 820 application and sent it back to the Department, finding the relevant criteria were met. Getting there, however, took several rounds of evidence.
Step 1. Understand what the family violence provisions actually do
Australia’s partner visa program is usually a two-stage process: a temporary visa (Subclass 820 onshore, or 309 offshore) followed by a permanent visa (801 or 100). Both stages generally require the relationship to be continuing.
Why the rules exist
Without an exception, a person whose relationship broke down because of family violence would lose their visa pathway at the same time as they lost their home and support. The family violence provisions in the Migration Regulations allow certain applicants to continue to be assessed for permanent residence even though the relationship has ended, where family violence is established in the way the regulations require.
Who they generally apply to
The provisions are limited. They generally apply to applicants who already hold or have applied for the relevant partner visa and whose relationship was genuine at the time it existed. Whether they apply to you depends on your visa subclass, when you applied and your individual circumstances, so this is something to confirm with a registered migration agent rather than assume.
Step 2. Know which evidence route your claim will run on
The regulations recognise two broad ways of establishing family violence, and they work very differently in practice.
The judicial route
This route relies on certain court outcomes — for example particular orders or findings made by an Australian court. Where it is available it is comparatively straightforward, because the court document itself does most of the work.
The non-judicial route
Most applicants do not have a qualifying court outcome, so they rely on the non-judicial route. This involves a statutory declaration by the applicant together with evidence from people the regulations describe as “competent persons” — a defined group of professionals such as certain medical practitioners, registered psychologists, social workers and others named in a legislative instrument. The instrument also sets out what those statements must contain.
| Judicial evidence | Non-judicial evidence | |
|---|---|---|
| Based on | Specified Australian court outcomes | Statutory declarations from the applicant and prescribed competent persons |
| Main risk | Availability — many applicants have no qualifying court order | Form — the statements must contain everything the legislative instrument requires |
| Common failure point | Assuming any court document will do | Supportive letters that describe violence but omit required content |
| Typical supporting material | Court records | Professional reports, treatment records, other corroborating evidence |
Step 3. Treat form as seriously as substance
This is the practical lesson from ARTA 1834. Early material from a GP and a service provider did not satisfy the relevant instrument, because it did not contain all of the required statements. The Tribunal identified the deficiencies more than once and asked for compliant evidence. Only when properly compliant statutory declarations from competent persons were provided, supported by detailed professional and other material, was the claim accepted.
Evidence that already exists is of no use if it is not lodged in the form the law requires. A letter that mentions family violence is not automatically evidence of family violence for migration purposes.
Why good documents still fail
Professionals who write these statements are usually not migration specialists. A GP letter, a counsellor’s summary or a support-service letter may be entirely truthful and still fall short, because the instrument prescribes particular content, not just a general description of what happened. That is a technical problem, and it is generally fixable — but it is far better to avoid it before lodgement than to repair it on review.
Step 4. If your partner visa is refused, watch the deadline first
Where a partner visa application is refused, there is usually a right to seek review at the Administrative Review Tribunal. The time limits are short and strictly applied, and in most cases they cannot be extended. The applicable deadline is stated on your refusal notification, so that document — and its date — is the first thing to check.
What Tribunal review is, in plain terms
Tribunal review is not an appeal about whether the Department behaved badly. The Tribunal looks at the application again and makes its own decision on the material before it, including new evidence you provide. That is why a refusal based on non-compliant evidence is not necessarily the end of the matter. Our guide on what to do if your visa is refused sets out the sequence in more detail.
Step 5. Build the claim around what the decision-maker must be satisfied of
Rather than assembling a pile of documents, work backwards from the questions the decision-maker has to answer. In broad terms, those themes include:
- whether the relationship was genuine while it existed;
- whether family violence, as defined for migration purposes, is established;
- whether the evidence relied on meets the specific requirements set by the regulations and the relevant instrument;
- whether the remaining visa criteria — health, character and the rest — are still satisfied.
What is actually relevant depends entirely on your individual circumstances and on a proper assessment of your file. That assessment is a large part of what a registered migration agent does at the start of a matter.
Safety comes before paperwork
If you are in immediate danger, contact police on 000. Support is available in Australia regardless of your visa status, and seeking help does not, of itself, put your application at risk. National family violence support is available through 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732.
Frequently asked questions
Does my visa application end automatically if my partner withdraws sponsorship?
Not necessarily. A sponsor withdrawing sponsorship is significant, but where the family violence provisions apply the application can generally continue to be assessed. In ARTA 1834 the sponsorship had been withdrawn and the application still succeeded on review.
Do I need a court order or a conviction?
No. The regulations provide a non-judicial route precisely because many people never go to court. That route has its own strict evidentiary requirements.
My doctor has written a letter. Is that enough?
It depends. A letter that mentions family violence does not automatically meet the legislative instrument’s requirements. The content of the statement matters, and this is generally where claims run into difficulty.
Can I still apply for review if my application was refused months ago?
Review time limits are short and are generally not extendable, so a lapsed deadline is a serious problem. It is still worth getting advice quickly, because other options may exist depending on your circumstances.
How HECT can help
HECT Migration & Appeal Experts is a registered migration agency that works on visa refusals, cancellations and Tribunal reviews every day. We assess whether the partner visa family violence provisions are available in your situation, identify whether your existing evidence meets the legal requirements, and manage the review process where a refusal has already been made. We also handle partner visa refusal appeals across all our Australian offices, and we work in English and Mandarin.
If your partner visa has been refused, or your relationship has ended while your application is pending, book a free visa appeal consultation and we will tell you plainly where you stand.
Source: Administrative Review Tribunal, 2214513 (Migration) [2026] ARTA 1834 (14 May 2026), published on AustLII. General visa and review procedure: Department of Home Affairs and the Administrative Review Tribunal.
This article is general information only and is not immigration assistance for your particular case. HECT Migration & Appeal Experts is a registered migration agency, not a law firm.
