Employer-Sponsored Visa Refused or Cancelled?
Check Your Employer-Sponsored Visa Appeal Options
Unsure what to do next? Speak with HECT’s visa appeal specialists about your situation.
Start With a Free Initial Call
Tell us what happened. Our team will contact you to discuss how we may be able to help.
Free initial consultation call.
No obligation to proceed.
Review rights, eligibility and time limits depend on your decision and circumstances.
Title Suggestion: 457 Visa AAT (Now ART) Appeal Success: Three-Year Battle Wins Employer Nomination Approval
Case Summary
Background:
Our client, Mr. G, had both his employer nomination and 457 visa application (now subclass 482) refused by the Department of Home Affairs. The core challenge of this case was the Department’s questions and concerns regarding the genuineness and necessity of the nominated position. The case underwent a three-year AAT (Now ART) review process, facing multiple serious challenges during this period.
Taking Over the Case:
Upon taking over the case, we conducted comprehensive and in-depth work to address the Department’s concerns:
In-depth Case Analysis: We carefully analyzed the refusal reasons, identifying that the dispute focused on position genuineness and business necessity.
Strategic Response Plan: We developed a multi-level argument strategy, comprehensively demonstrating the genuineness of the nominated position from perspectives including business operational needs, market environment, and position specificity.
Evidence System Construction: We assisted the client in preparing substantial evidence materials including:
Company financial reports and operational status proof
Market talent demand analysis reports
Position necessity justification statements
Business development planning documents
Records of local employee recruitment efforts
Continuous Supplementary Arguments: Throughout the three-year review process, we submitted additional submissions and evidence multiple times based on the Member’s requests, continuously strengthening our argument system.
The Day of the Hearing:
The case underwent two formal hearings. During the hearings, the Member raised detailed queries and doubts regarding position genuineness. Our Tribunal representative responded calmly, addressing all concerns effectively through pre-prepared detailed evidence and professional knowledge. We not only provided documentary evidence but also demonstrated the genuineness and business necessity of the nominated position through witness testimony and market data analysis.
Successful Outcome:
After three years of persistent effort and multiple supplementary arguments, the AAT (Now ART) Member ultimately recognized the genuineness of the employer nomination, setting aside the Department’s original decision and approving the employer nomination application. This victory paved the way for the client’s visa application, which was ultimately granted.
This case demonstrates our professional capability and enduring perseverance in handling complex employer sponsorship matters, particularly our extensive experience and exceptional ability in addressing position genuineness challenges.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASON FOR DECISION
Case Study Disclaimer
All case studies shared in this website are based on real client matters handled by HECT Migration & Appeal Experts. To protect the privacy of our clients, all identifying details such as names, locations, occupations and personal circumstances have been altered or omitted. Only core legal and strategic aspects relevant to the visa outcome are presented. These case studies are provided for general information purposes only and should not be interpreted as individual advice. Please do not attempt to identify or compare yourself with any case discussed.
